diff options
| author | Gunther6070 <haydenhartman10@yahoo.com> | 2025-04-13 15:56:20 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Gunther6070 <haydenhartman10@yahoo.com> | 2025-04-13 15:56:20 -0400 |
| commit | 467ce18fb14121679753213091a01440c9e50805 (patch) | |
| tree | bd296cdab8c0ab1fa27177b07e1b04901b0bb95c /docs/DesignDoc.md | |
| parent | 706068e98cedd2114741e92ec4fdbf77118d0623 (diff) | |
| download | JellySolutions-467ce18fb14121679753213091a01440c9e50805.tar.gz JellySolutions-467ce18fb14121679753213091a01440c9e50805.tar.bz2 JellySolutions-467ce18fb14121679753213091a01440c9e50805.zip | |
Removed merge mistake
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/DesignDoc.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/DesignDoc.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/docs/DesignDoc.md b/docs/DesignDoc.md index 651465d..93a61a1 100644 --- a/docs/DesignDoc.md +++ b/docs/DesignDoc.md @@ -274,8 +274,6 @@ We have 24 passing Acceptance Tests and 5 failing Acceptance Tests. 4 of these f Our unit testing strategy was to use a consistent styles of test across our persistence tier, model tier, and service/controller tier. On top of this, later on we had a single team member work on the majority of tests, resulting in a consistent style across all of the testing. On top of this, we consistently generated coverage reports and then wrote new tests to cover missing lines/branches. Overall, we had ~95% code coverage with the lowest coverage of a class being 82%. Our model tier was above 90% coverage. -Our unit testing strategy was to use a consistent styles of test across our persistence tier, model tier, and service/controller tier. On top of this, later on we had a single team member work on the majority of tests, resulting in a consistent style across all of the testing. On top of this, we consistently generated coverage reports and then wrote new tests to cover missing lines/branches. Overall, we had ~95% code coverage with the lowest coverage of a class being 82%. Our model tier was above 90% coverage. - > _**[Sprint 2, 3 & 4]** **Include images of your code coverage report.** If there are any anomalies, discuss > those._ |